[21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

This forum is founded on discussions about T Campbell's work (alone and with artist partners).

Moderators: Gisele, TCampbell

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby Artemisia » Wed Mar 21, 2012 5:16 pm

Fauxmosexuals?

Never heard THAT one before. . .
There was a girl who had a little curl right in the middle of her forehead, and when she was good, she was very, very good, and when she was bad she was homicidal.
I am a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife.
User avatar
Artemisia
 
Posts: 1323
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 12:03 am

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby Captain LeBubbles » Wed Mar 21, 2012 5:19 pm

Artemisia wrote:
Captain LeBubbles wrote:
Artemisia wrote:Her motives for going to that party weren't exactly pure or nice, she didn't exactly find out what kind of environment she was walking into, she assumed she was going to get some action out of it, she bullied Sara into wearing something very skimpy, and then, when she was rejected, she found the first bit of tail she could and had sex.


In fairness, the only detail about Lisa that Leah was privvy to was that Lisa wasn't strictly girls-only, and, depending on how loudly she announced their entrance, that she had at one point pretended to be. Leah didn't KNOW that Lisa was there trolling for tail after a bad day, she didn't KNOW that Lisa talked Sara into going or wearing "[her] most sluttastic clothes". As far as Leah knew, Sara was interested in joining LAZ and Lisa HAD gone to support her, or they were both looking into sorority membership and had just picked the first one they landed on. So while Lisa might not have been in the right in her motivations, but that doesn't justify Leah's actions in giving her the bum's rush, because she didn't KNOW anything about Lisa's motivations.


Well, as I said, I'm having trouble feeling sympathy for Lisa, but that doesn't mean that what happened with her was right; though I do have to admit being a bit miffed that she decided to invade a lesbian-only sorority, even if she wasn't thinking of pledging.


She didn't try to invade a lesbian-only sorority; she didn't know it was a lesbian-only sorority- evidenced by the fact she had to ask whether gays were even welcome there. Should she have done a bit of research? Probably, but one of the quickest ways to find out what sort of sorority one is is to go to a rush party. If she'd found all that out and then tried to join, yes, I suppose that could be considered 'invading'. But going to one party? That's not invading, that's going to a party that you don't know you don't really belong at.
A wild LeBubbles appeared!
Hexr wrote:Also, while you are all awesome people, I would like to applaud Captain Awesome LeBubbles. Sir, you're awesome, sir!

My LJ My DevART My Tumblr
User avatar
Captain LeBubbles
 
Posts: 1607
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:35 pm
Location: Georgia

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby Artemisia » Wed Mar 21, 2012 5:28 pm

Captain LeBubbles wrote:
Artemisia wrote:
Captain LeBubbles wrote:
Artemisia wrote:Her motives for going to that party weren't exactly pure or nice, she didn't exactly find out what kind of environment she was walking into, she assumed she was going to get some action out of it, she bullied Sara into wearing something very skimpy, and then, when she was rejected, she found the first bit of tail she could and had sex.


In fairness, the only detail about Lisa that Leah was privvy to was that Lisa wasn't strictly girls-only, and, depending on how loudly she announced their entrance, that she had at one point pretended to be. Leah didn't KNOW that Lisa was there trolling for tail after a bad day, she didn't KNOW that Lisa talked Sara into going or wearing "[her] most sluttastic clothes". As far as Leah knew, Sara was interested in joining LAZ and Lisa HAD gone to support her, or they were both looking into sorority membership and had just picked the first one they landed on. So while Lisa might not have been in the right in her motivations, but that doesn't justify Leah's actions in giving her the bum's rush, because she didn't KNOW anything about Lisa's motivations.


Well, as I said, I'm having trouble feeling sympathy for Lisa, but that doesn't mean that what happened with her was right; though I do have to admit being a bit miffed that she decided to invade a lesbian-only sorority, even if she wasn't thinking of pledging.


She didn't try to invade a lesbian-only sorority; she didn't know it was a lesbian-only sorority- evidenced by the fact she had to ask whether gays were even welcome there. Should she have done a bit of research? Probably, but one of the quickest ways to find out what sort of sorority one is is to go to a rush party. If she'd found all that out and then tried to join, yes, I suppose that could be considered 'invading'. But going to one party? That's not invading, that's going to a party that you don't know you don't really belong at.


I probably worded that very poorly, but it is kind of showing off my own prejudices and discomforts, if you will.
There was a girl who had a little curl right in the middle of her forehead, and when she was good, she was very, very good, and when she was bad she was homicidal.
I am a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife.
User avatar
Artemisia
 
Posts: 1323
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 12:03 am

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby mindstalk » Wed Mar 21, 2012 5:52 pm

Hasn't Sara been looking inclined to screw any female in sight? She's just not as good at it as Lisa so far.

Slut-shaming comic characters: Y/N?
User avatar
mindstalk
 
Posts: 588
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:02 am

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby Mr. Brightside » Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:18 pm

Captain LeBubbles wrote:She didn't try to invade a lesbian-only sorority; she didn't know it was a lesbian-only sorority- evidenced by the fact she had to ask whether gays were even welcome there.


...I'm pretty sure that was a joke.
(There has never been a signature.)
User avatar
Mr. Brightside
 
Posts: 2022
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:44 am

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby Artemisia » Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:22 pm

Mr. Brightside wrote:
Captain LeBubbles wrote:She didn't try to invade a lesbian-only sorority; she didn't know it was a lesbian-only sorority- evidenced by the fact she had to ask whether gays were even welcome there.


...I'm pretty sure that was a joke.


I don't have a sense of humor that I know of. . .

Well, at least while I'm PMSing.
There was a girl who had a little curl right in the middle of her forehead, and when she was good, she was very, very good, and when she was bad she was homicidal.
I am a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife.
User avatar
Artemisia
 
Posts: 1323
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 12:03 am

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby Mr. Brightside » Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:42 pm

Lisa, not you.
(There has never been a signature.)
User avatar
Mr. Brightside
 
Posts: 2022
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:44 am

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby Artemisia » Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:43 pm

See...I warned you...I'm completely confused now. No worries, though.
There was a girl who had a little curl right in the middle of her forehead, and when she was good, she was very, very good, and when she was bad she was homicidal.
I am a lizard woman from the dawn of time, and this is my wife.
User avatar
Artemisia
 
Posts: 1323
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 12:03 am

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby bunnyThor » Wed Mar 21, 2012 7:11 pm

TCampbell wrote:(and recent experience has taught me how much weight can be assigned to one single word)


I remember that. It was quite the

...

transgression.


Image
User avatar
bunnyThor
 
Posts: 780
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 1:38 am

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby Bardlp » Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:33 pm

*attempts to put sunglasses on BunnyThor; fails; puts both eyes out*

I forgive your jOCULARity.
Bardlp
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:56 am

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby CEOIII » Wed Mar 21, 2012 10:29 pm

bunnyThor wrote:
TCampbell wrote:(and recent experience has taught me how much weight can be assigned to one single word)


I remember that. It was quite the

...

transgression.


Image


WE WON'T GET FOOLED AGAIN!

And I'm a little upset at the idea of Lisa's motives being "unpure". Going to a party with the express goal of getting your rocks off isn't a federal stevedamned crime.
I'm Charlie Owens, good night, and good luck.
User avatar
CEOIII
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:49 am
Location: Franklin, PA

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby Muttley » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:52 am

Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! Nae master! We willnae be fooled again!

So, when is the next revolution scheduled? Got my diary here somewhere . . .
User avatar
Muttley
 
Posts: 220
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: North Downs, Kent, UK

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby showler » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:01 am

I can't really be the only one who tried http://squi.sh/jkr43 and was disappointed it was invalid, can I?
User avatar
showler
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:37 am

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby Lia S » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:56 am

showler wrote:I can't really be the only one who tried http://squi.sh/jkr43 and was disappointed it was invalid, can I?


I'm sure the owner of squi.sh is wondering where all that traffic is coming from.
Artemisia: if we cannot sympathize or understand then all we claim to be as human beings is just marsh gas
Valerie: Lia knows how to turn that frown upside-down. :D
User avatar
Lia S
 
Posts: 1009
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 11:53 am

Re: [21 Mar 12] Biphobic zeal

Postby Corneel » Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:59 am

Muttley wrote:Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! Nae master! We willnae be fooled again!

So, when is the next revolution scheduled? Got my diary here somewhere . . .

I'll have you know that that has been amended to: "Nae king, nae quin, nae laird! One baron –- and underrr mutually ag-rreeeed arrr-angement, ye ken!" as of the end of "I Shall Wear Midnight"
Corneel
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:12 am

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron